Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Planning a faculty develop program for blended or online?


Our materials are available through the Sloan Consortium at:
http://sloanconsortium.org/node/193
http://sloanconsortium.org/node/194

There also are an array of materials are available online at:
Http://hybrid.uwm.edu
https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/groups/sa/ltc/www/blendedpresentations/
Http://LTC.uwm.edu

Hope you find these materials useful

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

MOR leadership institute MKE

MOR leadership institute, Milwaukee, WI
Jan 10th - 11th


Personal notes and reflections


Day 1

Developing practices to enable you to lead:

1.) Prioritize what's important
2.) Be intentional: presence, what, how
3.) Allocate time to what's important
4.) Manage your calendar
5.) Delegate, develop, coach
Brian McDonald, MOR Associates, Inc

Is this something we should be doing anymore?

Steps in Strategic Thinking
1.  Frame the issue at the strategic level (versus tactical). For example,
how could we better serve our customers? How could we better
leverage technology?
2.  Outline the options.
3.  Identify important considerations (such as alignment with corporate direction, impact on customers, cost or revenue implications,
etc.).
4.  Develop a couple scenarios and play out your premises.
5.  Determine the right thing to do from a strategic perspective.
6.  Design an action plan.
Brian McDonald, MOR Associates, Inc

Practices Designed to Develop Strategic Thinking
The following are practices MOR Associates has used with clients to
help develop strategic thinking within multiple levels of the organization.
1.  Asking participants to identify external or internal forces and trends
or customer feedback or financial data and play out the implications of this analysis. This exercise, wherever it begins, invites
people to explore different scenarios.
2.  Simply having people identify 3 to 5 strategic issues within their
unit will help participants focus on critical areas within their sphere
of influence. Once they start this practice, it is easy to spot other
issues that have longer-term implications they need to consider.
3. Engaging people from different levels of the organization in task
forces, focus groups, or action learning teams will give participants
a practice field for developing their strategic thinking capability.
4. Having people use a different format for taking notes can help
sharpen an individual’s strategic lens.
5. Having managers ask the right questions can also foster strategic
thinking. Examples might be: What other scenarios have you considered? What do you think the long-term implications are if we
do that? Using coaching questions such as these will, in some cases,
prompt people to raise their perspective.
Brian McDonald, MOR Associates, Inc

Reflections and goals
  1. Defensive calendaring
  2. Limit email in the morning (don't check it for 30 minutes in the AM), what are the 3-5 things you want to get done today
  3. Explore google tasks lists for staff and self, schedule time to review/prioritize/focus tasks
  4. Explore remember the milk, multiple lists, set alerts
  5. Continue to focus on not interrupting staff spontaneously
  6. Share more the variables that impact decision making (i.e., faculty/students needs, UWM goals, national trends, viability based on LTC resources ($, staff time, etc.), LTC staff interests)
  7. Be more explicit about expectations of the unit, individuals
  8. Empower staff through knowledge (budget, decision-making, etc)
  9. Share more philosophies, priorities, etc., to aid in decision making
  10. Empower staff to take the lead on projects, relinquish need to be copied on all email, figure out how to stay in the loop
  11. Develop groups to take on internal and external work process and communication needs (synchronous, email, calendaring, marketing, website, status reporting)
  12. Focus status based on project rather than the individual
  13. Complete laundry list of projects, prioritize, get rid of the fat
  14. Figure out how to focus on myself, my needs
  15. Review Meeting 1 coaching sheet

Never focus on the lack of resources - focus on projects which are a priority

SWOT activity

Impact of societal values and practices on university work processes, including business services, research, teaching and learning, i.e., mobile, open, free, cloud, synchronous, automation

Specifically, transformation of the expectations for student and faculty support to be 24/7, just in time, real time, user driven ; providing of services through an array of devices leading to development of applications that are device and platform agnostic; increase in use of free, web 2.0, cloud services leading to an increase university costs for human resources to support; increase in expectation for "free" services (i.e., wireless, software, learning management systems, course offerings, open source, etc.); making key decisions about what devices and software to support, to what degree, how to secure; consideration of freedom of location and need to "move time" in program offerings, services provided (tech, library);

Increase in accountability due to decrease in funding from State and due to new Federal legistation (i.e., state authorization act, credit hour for seat time).

Day 2

Reflection/Commitments --

  1. Implementing strategic planning framework pp. 98-99 -- very practical since question driven
  2. SWOT exercise (strength, weaknesses, opportunities, threats) delivered via qualtrics, then discuss f2f
  3. Schedule time for strategic planning
  4. Develop vision (what kind of organization do we want to be? what will it be like for our stakeholders when we achieve our vision? what values are most important?)
  5. Implement strategic planning model, could be used on a per project basis
  6. Implement defensive calendar, task lists, remember the milk, no email for 30 min in AM
  7. Empower staff w/knowledge to enhance decision making -- what knowledge or info should be shared?
  8. Share external scan with unit staff, economy, technology, government, demographics, stakeholder, other
Tanya's philosophies - delegation


Find your staff's strengths/interests and match them to an organizational task
I don't delegate, I give team members the lead on a project
Empower your staff with knowledge so they can lead and make decisions as you would
In order for my team members to get their job done, I ask them what they *need* from me

MOR - Learning community group - Vision


Establish a community with which to receive coaching
Establish culture of interinstitution collaboration
Be able to better accomplish UW system  mission
Develop support networks and build relationship among leaders in UW System
Monitor community challenges and successes
Leverage connections to improve flow of info and expertise
Catalyst -- Leading to improve campus communities

From vision to strategy

Group A - vision statement
Group B - strategies and tactics to obtain vision (i.e., peer coaching, reflection)
Group C - what are strategies and actions for MOR Assoc coaches
Group D - What will help/hinder achieving vision
Group E - How do we stay the course -- maintain enthusiasm - what will we need to do to support this change, continuous, so it comes to fruition


Group B - strategies and actions to obtain vision
(i.e., peer coaching, reflection, commitment statements)


continued interaction
digital form of communication, synchronous meetings, wiki with push to email or rss feed to aggregate like google reader, fb, twitter, ifttt
f2f meetings, bi-annually or quarterly - at ITMC

affinity groups around projects (tech implementations, process orientated or thematic, improving skill or strategies,

moving accountability to our community

VISION -- create a collaborative community that is committed to developing our shared leadership and the success of our individual campuses and UW systems...

Ask for a rating of a 1-10 in agreement rather than yes or no

Neuroscience

70-905 reiterates patterns
10-30% mindful

Game, neuroscience
7, 14, 21, 28...
7, 17, 27...





































Monday, December 19, 2011

Search for an instructional design consultant


University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Position Vacancy Announcement
Instrumentation Innovator – Instruction
Learning Technology Center
Academic Affairs
Working Title:                                   Instructional Design Consultant
Appointment Type/%:                      Ad Hoc, Academic Staff, 50-100%, 6 months
Position Description:  The person in this position plays a key role in UWM's efforts to develop and deliver hybrid/ blended, online, and technology-enhanced courses.  This person works with faculty and teaching staff and provides them with the pedagogical consultation, instructional design support, and software instruction needed to develop successful and effective hybrid /blended, online, and technology-enhanced courses.  In order to better understand the needs of faculty and teaching staff and the challenges they face using technology for instruction, this person is expected to teach a course or course module each year.

Duties and Responsibilities

§  Provide individual pedagogical and instructional design consultation for faculty and teaching staff who need assistance and support developing hybrid /blended, online, and technology-enhanced courses.
  • Responsible for coordinating instructional design services for one or more UWM's hybrid/blended programs and/or online programs.
§  Assist with the planning, designing, promotion, and teaching of faculty development programs, educational technology workshops, and demonstrations designed for faculty and teaching staff who are developing hybrid/blended, online, and technology-enhanced courses.
§  Help provide the workshops, support, and consultation needed by faculty and teaching staff to effectively use the campus course management system, Desire2Learn.
§  Provide assistance for faculty who are using rich media, podcasting, student response systems (clickers), and other technologies in their courses.
§  Teach or contribute to the teaching one section of a credit course for an academic department each year.
§  Assist with the development and writing of grant proposals and with identifying extramural sources of funding for LTC activities related to hybrid/blended learning, online learning, and learning technologies and, when appropriate, help coordinate the activities of these projects.
§  Participate in professional development activities such as workshops and conferences in order to keep abreast of new developments in the instructional uses of technology, and help present papers and reports on LTC initiatives at professional conferences.

 

Required Qualifications for Instructional Designer

  • Masters degree
  • Teaching experience at the college level that includes hybrid /blended, online, or technology-enhanced courses.
  • Experience and skill in using course management systems such as Desire2Learn, Blackboard, and WebCT.

Preferred Qualifications for Instructional Designer

  • Ph.D. or equivalent terminal degree.
  • Experience and success consulting with faculty and academic staff on instructional design issues, including the development of hybrid/blended and online courses and the effective use of technology for teaching and learning.
  • A demonstrated commitment to providing the best quality of service and support to faculty and teaching staff.
  • Experience working with rich media, podcasting, and student response systems is preferred.
  • Effective public speaking, presentation, and listening skills.
  • Excellent writing and interpersonal communication skills.
  • Ability to work independently and collaboratively as a member of a small, tightly-integrated unit.
  • Ability to set priorities and meet deadlines in a very busy and rapidly evolving department.
  • Excellent organizational and problem-solving/troubleshooting skills.

 

Salary/Pay Basis


Salary Range:             $45,000 to $61,000, 12 month annual basis.


Application Procedures:


Please send brief letter of application, vita, names and contact information of three references, and a two-page writing sample to Tanya Joosten, tjoosten@uwm.edu.

Tentative starting date: January, 2012



UWM is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity employer.
All finalists for this position will require a criminal records review consistent with the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act
The names of nominees and applicants who have not requested in writing that their identities be withheld and the names of all finalists will be released upon request.
For the UWM Campus Security Report see http://www.cleryact.uwm.edu or call the Office of Student Life at 414.229.4632 for a paper copy.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Social Mobile Activity


Social Mobile Activity, 3:00PM to 4:00PM



Question:
Why is EDUCAUSE the best thinking in Higher Ed IT?



Learning Outcomes
- provide an active learning opportunity
- increase interactivity, engagement, and cooperation
- develop 21st century skills



Learning Activity
An experiential learning activity facilitating the use of mobile social, including user generated content and student driven content (links, images, video) captured and shared on mobile devices, using mobile apps, browsers, and social media (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, and more).



Objective
Develop an argument using social media to answer the question outlined above. The tasks outlined below will assist you in your data collection, research, and evidence building in order to develop your argument and earn points.  This information gathered on mobile devices will be shared through mobile social media apps.  


The team with the most points wins!



Note: Tips in helping you complete the tasks will be tweeted out by @tjoosten or @csoleil using the hashtag #edusocmedia


Tasks



Develop and tweet the name of your group and it's members using the hashtag #edusocmedia. Include your group name as a hashtag on all of your posts (e.g., #teamx). 5 points


Create a Facebook fan page for your group where you will share your research and evidence answering the questions, “Why is EDUCAUSE the best thinking in Higher Ed IT?” Tweet out the URL using #edusocmedia #teamx. 20 points



Find an article or blog by someone reflecting on the annual EDUCAUSE conference and share out on Twitter using #edusocmedia #teamx. 10 points*



Post an image of something that represents the conference on Twitter or another social media tool using #edusocmedia #teamx. 10 points*



Post an image of 5 or more attendees at EDUCAUSE on Flickr or another image sharing tool using #edusocmedia #teamx. 20 points*



Post a 30 sec+ video of an individual discussing why they feel EDUCAUSE is the best thinking in Higher Ed IT on Youtube or another video sharing tool and tag with #edusocmedia #teamx. 20 points*



Post a 30 sec+ video with one EDUCAUSE staff member discussing why they feel EDUCAUSE is the best thinking in Higher Ed IT on Youtube or another video sharing tool and tag with #edusocmedia #teamx. 20 points*

Post a 30 sec+ video with a conference attendee on what they are looking forward to doing this week at Educause on Youtube or another video sharing tool and tag with #edusocmedia #teamx. 20 points*


Find a video of an individual discussing their EDUCAUSE experience and post on your Facebook fan page or Tweet tag with #edusocmedia #teamx. 10 points*


Share your images, videos, and articles collected on your Facebook fan page. 50 points


*tasks can be done more than once to score additional points



Bonus points:

Each retweet of another team tweet, 5 points
Reply to another team’s tweet, 5 points
Each Youtube video or other of another team favorites/liked, 5 points
Including your location on social media updates, 5 points
Liking a Facebook post of another team, 5 points
Commenting on another team's YouTube Video, 10 points
Each "tip" you tweet out to the other teams*, 10 points


Deadline: 4:00PM








Friday, October 14, 2011

Social Media at EDUCAUSE #edu11


10/18/2011


Seminar 14A - Teaching and Learning with Social and Digital Media in Higher Education
http://www.educause.edu/events/E11/SEM14A


Seminar 14P - "Social Mobile" Learning for Educators
http://www.educause.edu/events/E11/SEM14P


10/19/2011


Expert Discussion Session: Using Social Media to Leverage Your Professional Networks, Online Conference
http://www.educause.edu/events/E112/OL02


10/20/2011


Social Media - Constituent Group Meeting
http://www.educause.edu/events/E11/DISC49
What topics should we discuss?

Hashtags:
1. Don't forget to use the #edu11 hashtags in your tweets at the conference and to connect with folks.  
2. Also, please use #edusocmedia for posts or resources related to educational uses of social media.


updated 10.14.11

Others:


EDUCAUSE has given the constituent groups some extra exposure this year and we wanted to share them with you!


We'll be part of the poster sessions taking place during the following times:
Wednesday - 1:30-2:30PM
Thursday - 12:30-1:30PM


We'll also be in the Constituent Group Lounge during the following times for anyone that might need or want a little hands-on help getting set up with different social media accounts, talking through best practices, use of social media - or anything else!
Wednesday - 10:30-11:20AM
Wednesday - 2:30-3:20PM
Thursday - 1:30-2:20PM


Stop by and see us, we'd love to chat with you!


An Online Learning Community: What We Learned During the Design, Build, and Launch
Carrie L. Saarinen, Instructional Designer, Programs Coordinator, Brown University Oct 19th, 2011Wednesday, 1:30 PM - 2:30 PM, Table 74, Exhibit Hall A/B/Chttp://www.educause.edu/E2011/Program/PS024 


updated 10.15.11

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Social Media for Educators -- Book cover has arrived!


The marketing team just sent to me the cover for the book.  It took me a minute to digest it, but I am super excited about the design.  Again, the book will be arriving in the spring.  




You can now pre-order the book in the US at:



Thursday, September 15, 2011

To eText or no?



This @wiredcampus article got me thinking, once again, about the push for etexts by publishers and some in higher ed.


http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/major-publishers-join-indiana-u-project-that-requires-students-to-use-e-textbooks/33156?sid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en



I would support use of free OER over publisher driven #etexts.  I have used etexts and digital articles in lieu of traditional textbooks because they provide increased access for students at a reduced or free price.  I was one of those students that had a very challenging time affording my textbooks.


When visiting Alex Pickett at SUNY and working with her group on their NGLC grant, I was surprised and excited that they had set a ceiling of $50 for student materials for the course, mainly the textbook.  They were looking to use OER over an expensive textbook.  This was definitely going to be a challenge for faculty.  They know needed time and new skills to locate the needed content.


For years, the textbook was an easy task for educators.  I have a few choices in my class.  I used the same one for years.  It was the same one which my instructor used when I was an undergraduate.  The textbook also guides many faculty learning outcomes, course design, and more, where really our learning outcomes, desired results, should be guiding us.  Textbooks need to stop driving us...


Also, educators need new skills in locating and evaluating OER -- rubrics, checklist, etc.  Anyone have any?


When I tried etextbooks out, 4-5 years ago, in order to give my students greater access to the text, to the content, there were lots of technical challenges with publisher "walls." Students paid, but then couldn't access the reading.  There were lots of security mechanisms in place no just-in-time technical support when needed.  Also, students needed a new username and password, which they often misplaced or lost.  Further, they weren't able to download them.  They had to read them within the publisher site.  Technical problems diminishing access is a concern.  


At the time the ebook or etext or etextbook was offered at about 40% of the price of the paper book.  However, this has changed and we are now seeing these digital versions being offered at the same or a greater price eliminating the idea of affordable access.


I moved to focus on backward design, my learning outcomes, and then used those to find free digital content for my students through an array of textbooks, journal articles, and web sites.


The second reason I see for etexts is for the ability to annotate (which can be done with any digital article in Adobe Acrobat Pro) or have rich, engaging activities integrated within them (e.g., 3D animated objects).  This is the main reason where digital texts can lead to increase learning based on the pedagogical use.


In this article, the study is troubling in ways.  We need better methodology in evaluating etextbooks.  Learning was equated to the grade, and it showed no impact on "student learning."  It also appears that the instrument didn't ask about any technological challenges, ease of use, accessing ebook (McGraw Hill authentication), cost, etc.  

On twitter, a colleauge tells me that maybe mode and method of delivery doesn't matter (See post http://screencast.com/t/SrPCOMWzRb). Is this truly the case?  


The bottom line is what does the digital delivery of text facilitate, if anything?  Like any digital technology, it will greatly depend on how it is used.  If you are not going to strategically implement the etext into your course design (e.g., in class annotation or interaction with text), then there is not going to be an impact on your desired learning outcomes.


So, again, before embarking on these etext initiatives, let's really focus on what is important and what is the desired impact on students.  Simply offering a digital version of a paper textbook is not going to necessarily increase student learning.
  

Saturday, September 3, 2011

Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube: Social media for educators at DTL

Workshop presented at the 27th Annual Distance Teaching and Learning Conference in Madison, WI on August 3rd, 2011.

Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube: Social media for educators


Tanya Joosten, Associate Director & Sharon Stoerger, Learning Technology Consultant, Learning Technology Center, UW–Milwaukee (with Matthew Russell and Dylan Barth)

Social media tools are changing how we communicate and build networks, offering powerful learning opportunities for students and professionals. Explore how social media can support pursuit of your instructional and professional goals.


Presentation slides



Evaluation

27TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DISTANCE TEACHING & LEARNING
EVALUATION SUMMARY

Session Title: Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube: Social Media for educators 

Presenter(s): Tanya Joosten and Sharon Stoerger 

Scale:     5 = Excellent      4 = Very Good      3 = Good      2 = Fair      1 = Poor

ITEM     MEAN SCORE

1)   Presentation Style 4.55
2)   Presenter knowledge           4.83
3)   Quality of Information 4.61
4)   Quality of visuals used 4.67
5)   Quality of activities/discussions 4.55
6)   Overall rating 4.67

I LEARNED:

A GREAT DEAL:  12 
A MODERATE AMOUNT: 4
A LIMITED AMOUNT: 0

THE REASON I SELECTED THIS WORKSHOP

12 Curiosity about topic            
4 need to know about this for a project
0 Heard speaker present before
0 recommended by someone
1 Heard/read about presenter(s)
2 Other (Please Explain)
    Is very important to my DL courses
    Need to introduce and promote the topic where I work

TOPICS OF FUTURE INTEREST

  • YouTube
  • If it catches – Google +
  • This workshop assumes a lot of knowledge already. You should have session for beginners.
ATTENDEE COMMENTS

  • Excellent workshop. Would love a follow-up discussion
  • Excellent presenters
  • Fantastic!
  • Thank you! I’m already using most of these tools but appreciate some new ideas for social connectivity in courses. Also appreciate skill at keeping participants on track!
  • Excellent session
  • Very informative! I have a lot to do…
  • Liked how we did activities instead of an information dump. Was engaging.
  • Excellent session!
  • Moved too fast at the beginning (twitter). Needs to explain who is seeing what after we post. Explain “risks” for those who value privacy (and exposure)
  • I wish just a bit more time could have been included about the basics

Monday, August 29, 2011

Using Wikipedia in the classroom?

Resources:






Access: Digital content, books, lectures...

[working draft]

Strategic brainstorming

 How do we use it to scale use of digital media in online and blended courses?  How can OER lead to increase access and affordability of digital resources for students (in lieu of textbooks) AND faculty (time and energy)? What effective models of implementation for faculty and faculty development are available?  How do we assist faculty in identifying appropriate OER? and so forth...

Goals....

Work with GER faculty to identify strategies to delivery content in an digital, affordable, and accessible format.  GER content is more generalizable and changes less than upper level specialized classes focusing on higher order learning.

Offering students "digital" content for under $50 or free, esp for freshman/sophomore foundation and large lectures classes.

Identify how to best select OER materials for integration into course...identify model for course integration.

Teach faculty how to use OER to select and integrate resources into their courses rather then spending time and resources on reinventing the wheel. Will safe time and resources for faculty in developing digital content.